
Team India went with KL Rahul instead of Rishabh Pant in the first ODI game against England. He was India’s wicket-keeper and did well with the gloves. The hosts went on to win the game quite comfortably in the first ODI and will be looking forward to winning the series as well. After a brilliant series victory in the T20Is, their focus shifted to ODI cricket, which was just brilliant. Moreover, if we compare Rahul to Pant, the first thing that comes in is experience. Rahul has been a consistent member of the team and has played in 77 ODI games since his debut, while Pant has played half of it, that is, 31. This is one of the main reasons why he was chosen over Pant.
Here are the three reasons why KL Rahul was chosen over Rishabh Pant:
1. Reliable in long formats
KL Rahul is one of the best middle-order batters India have at this point. He takes on the responsibility when the team needs him the most. This is one of the best qualities he has within himself. Also, he can bat in any order and is flexible.
2. Consistency
Rahul has scored 2831 runs in 77 games at an average of 49.15. Meanwhile, Pant has scored 871 runs in 31 matches at an average of 33.50. The runs speak a lot about the player’s performance in the format, and hence, he deserves a place in the team.
3. Better shot selection
When it comes to shot selection, KL Rahul is a much more reliable player than Rishabh Pant. While Pant is highly celebrated for his weird shots, he somehow fails to perform during crunch situations and gets out playing the weirdest shots. Hence, Rahul is preferred over Pant in the first game.
Disclaimer: This Exclusive News is based on the author’s understanding, analysis, and instinct. As you review this information, consider the points mentioned and form your own conclusions.